Integration of health and social care has been on the agenda
since the turn of the century and has been talked about for a good deal longer.
Will we still be talking about it at the turn of the next century or will
someone actually be doing something about it?
Is your organisation doing something about it or are you,
like the majority, merely paying lip service to what is, admittedly, a noble cause?
The logic is faultless but the application seems to be a
good deal more complicated than some would have us believe. We know it’s
desirable but is it really possible to bring two systems together to work
seamlessly in the delivery of care? It can be difficult enough to get
professionals of a similar discipline to work as a team when managing complex
health and care packages. When we ask them to work across professional and
organisational boundaries we’d better make sure the infrastructure is there to
support them. But what is this infrastructure? What does it consist of and who
is going to take responsibility for maintaining it? Are the differences in
culture so different that we will never truly have an integrated system?
Multidisciplinary teams already exist to manage complex
needs. We only need to look at the cases of NHS continuing healthcare to see
that it is possible for decisions about health and social care to be made
coherently and it is a credit to many of those teams that they can unpick the
myriad of needs affecting patients and put together packages of care that meet
the needs of the whole person and indeed the needs of those around them. It
strikes me however, that it is not so much the decision-making or the ‘design’
but the implementation of those decisions and designs that is the real
challenge of integrating health and social care. I wonder whether the
fundamental differences in a)culture and b)training for clinicians in
healthcare, as opposed to those in social care,
are such that there will never really be a genuinely integrated health
and social care system. This sounds defeatist from the outset but I think it
highlights just two areas (and there are many more), that need to be addressed
if we are going to achieve this holy grail of a truly integrated health and
social care system.
It’s worth shining the spotlight on some of the most complex
cases requiring input from health and social care services. The provision of
NHS continuing healthcare, by definition, applies to people with long term
health and social care needs where the dominant need is deemed to be a ‘health
care need’ as opposed to a ‘social care need’. So here’s the thing, what is the
difference between health and social care? When does one begin and the other
end? As with many other things, it is
the boundary, the borderline, the areas that are most difficult to define,
where clarity is needed. It is at these professional and organisational boundaries
where problems arise and where problems must be resolved in order for
integration to occur.
We will consistently be returning to the questions of
infrastructure and health versus care culture. It is surely a given that
training will be key to any integrated system of health and social care. It is
clear that joined up working can only be enhanced by joined up training. It is
not entirely clear to me at present which organisations are really taking the
lead in this integration of health and social care at a local level. NHS
organisations and Local Authorities certainly have responsibility to design
such a system but where is the guiding light? Where is the beacon that shows
that people are receiving a genuinely joined up, integrated health and social
care system? Is such a thing possible?
No comments:
Post a Comment