E-learning vs. face-to-face training, which is best?

Face-to-face training has been a consistent form of training for many years and as it is not dependent on technology it is understandable why some may be attached to this method and be resistant to the thought of changing to something new like e-learning. What is e-learning and how can sitting in front of a computer screen possibly be more beneficial than being able to interact with a trainer in a classroom setting?

Let’s imagine we are sat in the classroom right now with our colleagues, the trainer walks in, greets us and then begins their journey through a multitude of PowerPoint slides. How likely is your mind to wander elsewhere, perhaps onto how many emails you have waiting to be answered or what we might be having for lunch?  There can be many distractions in a classroom and it can be hard for the trainer to know if all learners are really paying attention and how much information is being retained.

How does e-learning technology compare?

E-learning doesn’t prevent interaction; it encourages it and pushes the learner into taking on an active role rather than passive.  Yes the learner must have the motivation to sit down and go through all of the material, but there is no way of missing out information or becoming distracted. The interactive quizzes and functionality of the e-learning material ensures that learners work through each step, gaining underpinning knowledge and completing competency assessments along the way.

The obvious advantage of using e-learning to train your staff is that it allows them to learn at a time, pace and place which suits you and the learner.  This method of training is ideal for a large dispensed workforce: learners can work through the material in an environment which is best for them, they simply need internet access.  E-learning can be tailored to meet individual requirements and the variety of digital technologies incorporated into the course material (text, imagery, animation, audio, video) allow for different learning styles. The course material is continuously updated with changes to legislation and learners can revisit units if necessary. The Learner Management System provides management information and allows for an audit trail and evidence for CQC requirements.

Overhead costs can be reduced by eliminating the need for travel, accommodation and food expenses as well as external trainer costs, room hire and having to take staff out of their day to day roles and cover shifts. Remove all of these costs and you are only left with the initial cost of implementing the e-learning course. E-learning is the clear winner in terms of cost.

Blended learning is the best possible training method and can enhance the overall learning process, offering a collaborative and holistic approach to learning.  I am by no means claiming that face-to-face training is ineffective but with the advances in technology in the past decade, it is unquestionable not to incorporate e-learning into your training and development programme.

The evidence is there - over 10 years of our learner feedback shows that 85% of learners prefer e-learning over face to face training.

Lack of knowledge is not accepted as a legal stand. Completed training is. Certificates can be printed off after completing the e-learning training and used as evidence of best practice.

If you had the option to reduce all of your training costs yet keep the quality of your staff training at a consistently high standard, would this be of interest to you?